More for the contest






 Scheduling and Platform: Noted Problems Section


For individual pages, to continue in the future as habit, later:

Whether you notice discriminatory actions based on politics or emotion that appear to be coming from the platform itself. 

Discriminatory actions from the community in the platform are not important for this sheet, more interested in if they shut people down from inside the workings of the company/developers side, because that's illegal for companies based in the US or if not in law yet, could and should be a protection put in place. It is also several orders of magnitude greater in terms of 'evil' than simply vocalizing dislike. 

It basically silences and allows for destruction of an entire group of ideology, which if you historically supported things like equal rights, women voting, lgbtq freedom, religious freedom, ect (for americans) You should disagree with that practice even for your 'enemies' ideologically. If you can't disagree with your ideological enemies being stopped from speaking and existing, you don't deserve to speak and exist.

I suppose the 'freedom' test is whether you can fight for the people whose ideologies you despise or disagree strongly with to have the right to speak. (At one point, that seems simple and easy: Do you want to not get shut down by platforms when you mention your god or religion or talk about how much they matter to you? (If you're christian. If you're muslim. If you're atheist. XD) Nah, I prefer that platforms like google, facebook, instagram, twitter, so on do not pick who is allowed to speak. Or people that work for those platforms are not allowed to pick who is allowed to speak. It gets so much more complicated when it’s an ideology or belief that you fundamentally disagree with at your very core. It’s the same thing though.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crossbone Pirate, Slink

Crossbone Pirate